Monthly Archives: April 2009

Nescafé Taster’s Choice Paints a Pretty Picture

Nescafé Taster's Choice ad

I’ve started posting the image at a larger size, so it’s easier to see. As always, you can click on the image to open a new window showing a larger image.

This ad for for Nescafé Taster’s Choice is great. It’s an illustration of a woman with a cup of coffee, done in coffee. And, get this…just four words of copy:

Gourmet in an instant.

So there’s a great illustration, a product image that’s integrated into the illustration (the coffee is coming from the jar), and four words of copy. The result is easy to understand and appealing.

Break out the 5 monkeys!

5_monkeys

The Coveted 5 Monkeys Award

Benefiber: The Old Man in the Bottle

ad_270

I was looking at this ad for Benefiber, trying to figure out the relationship of the liquids to the bars. I figured it’s supposed to be the juice that went into the flavors of the bar.

Then something hit me.

I used to be interested in subliminal advertising—hidden pictures that are supposed to influence your perception of the product. I’ve seen enough examples of the use of subliminals to believe that it’s real but for the purpose of this blog, I don’t look for them or discuss the subject. Someone can do an entire blog on subliminals, but that’s outside the scope of this blog.

Having said that, this jumped out at me, so I have to comment on it.

Take a look at the faces in the liquid. They’re profiles that look like old bearded Asian men. Here’s a detail:

ad_270a

Here’s the same image converted to black and white with the extraneous detail removed:

ad_270b

Now click on the complete ad at the top of the page to open an enlarged version in a new window. Since each bottle is essentially a duplicate of the others, you’ll see four faces, two looking to the left and two looking to the right. It’s like there are two pairs of faces looking at each other.

There’s another strange image in the mix here. If you look at the color detail image above, you’ll see something above the face image that looks like a thumb. It’s where the brim of the cap would be, at the upper left.

I don’t know why these images appear in this ad. It could be a joke on the part of the graphics people. It could be a subliminal that’s supposed to influence the consumer in some way.

What do you think?

Benadryl Wants You Out of the House

Benadryl ad

Here’s what’s brilliant about this ad for Benadryl. All they needed to get their message across is four words, an image, and a logo. It’s simple and easy to understand. As an added bonus, the ad is kind of funny.

Yes, there’s some copy at the bottom, but it’s superfluous. Most readers will simply ignore it.

I would have made the headline larger because I found myself looking at the image first and then searching for copy to give it context. If the headline was more prominent, that problem would have been avoided.

On Rules

rules

Here are some excerpts from Saturday’s post on Seth Godin’s Blog:

…Let me be really clear: My job is not to tell you what to do. I don’t know what to do. You do.

Not just me, of course. Everybody with a blog or a book or an interest in your success. Don’t do what they say. Listen to their questions instead.

…I don’t have a lot of patience for this list of seven rules or that manual of how it’s supposed to be or the step-by-step road map you can purchase today only. I think you’ll do a lot better if you get optimistic about the future and cynical about pat answers at the same time instead.

I thought about this in light of one of my posts called 10 Rules for Print Ads. Some of these rules should never be broken, such as being truthful in advertising and avoiding hype. Other than that, I talk about what’s logical and what makes sense or doesn’t make sense to me.

One of the limitations of my perspective is that I’m not privy to the sales figures for a particular advertiser. I might talk about how awful I think a particular ad is while the advertiser is happily raking in cash as a result of the ad. Conversely, an ad that I praise as being effective may be a colossal failure at increasing sales.

I went to art school, so I have a background in design and photography. I’m a writer, so I know a few things about writing copy. If you’re out in the field creating ad campaigns, you know your job better than I do.

My rules are intelligent and logical. But like most rules, they’re made to be broken every now and again. If you’re a marketer or creating advertising, your job (as Seth would say) is to create something remarkable.

Frequently, that means breaking the rules.

Just For Fun: Toyota Corolla

Two versions of the same Toyota commercial for different markets.

Singulair Nose How to Create an Ad

This ad for Singulair uses an image that’s visceral. You certainly don’t have to think about the meaning. The negative space is used effectively as a space to hold copy (although there’s a bit too much copy).

If you take the parts of the ad that people are likely to read: the image, the headline (go nose to nose with alleries) and the product name Singulair, you understand everything you need to know about the ad. That’s a good thing.

Alright, let’s break out the 5 monkeys!

5 Monkeys!

The prestigious 5 Monkeys Award.

Tic Tac Chill: Reload the Copy

tic tac ad

I like the way this ad for Tic Tac Chill combines the photo illustration with the product image. I’ll always give points to an ad that limits the use of copy, as long as the message of the ad gets through.

But I wouldn’t have used the line: Take a load off with Tic Tac Chill. The word load is too, um, loaded. In popular vernacular, you can say that something is a load of crap, a load of rubbish, a load of bollocks, or a load of shite. You can shoot your load, drop a load, or load a fat one (joint). You can load a gun.

Now I feel like George Carlin.

The point is that none of these uses of the word load are positive. I’m not saying that using the word destroys the ad, but I would have avoided using it.

One more thing: Is it a coincidence that the product image kind of looks like an iPod?

ipod-classic-1

Sheba Cat Food: The Vastness of Space

ad_266

The headline in this ad for Sheba cat food reads:

THERE IS NOTHING
GOURMET ABOUT
MEAT BY-PRODUCTS

They’re correctly implying that meat by-products don’t belong in pet food, a point that I first talked about a few weeks ago. But if meat by-products are undesirable in pet food, why does the manufacturer, Mars Petcare, put meat-by products in some of their other products, such as Pedigree dog food?

Getting back to the ad…I think it’s badly designed. The use of negative space doesn’t seem to work and the images are too small. On the positive side, they used a minimal amount of copy.

Trojan Condoms: For a Good Time, Avoid the Swine

Trojan ad

This is one of those rare times that I’m stumped. On one hand, I personally like this ad for Trojan condoms because it’s so weird and surreal. It’s certainly memorable.

On the other hand, I wonder if the pigs are a turn-off to women, who this ad is supposed to be targeting.

I’ll leave it up to you to decide. Post a comment with your thoughts.

McCormick Jumps on the Antioxidant Bandwagon

McCormick ad

Visually, I like this ad for McCormick spices. It’s well-designed, colorful, and visually clever, which is never a bad thing.

But McCormick knows that their claims of health benefits from antioxidants are overblown. That’s why the copy says:

Is there anything better than adding a favorite ingredient that may also support your health?

It may support your health. But then again, it may not. There’s no proof that antioxidants have any positive effect on human health and there are even claims that they may be harmful.

The bottom line? Some advertisers make exaggerated claims that play on people’s fears of illness and death in order to sell products. Consumers shouldn’t be mindless sheep that just suck up advertising messages uncritically (am I mixing my metaphors here?). A little healthy skepticism goes a long way.